Welcome! Opinions on family, faith, life, politics and now, Christian Fiction

Prolife Discrimmination

Posted by MDViews on July 26, 2009

Dear Reader,

Following is a piece I recently wrote to a reporter from WORLD magazine explaining some pro-life discrimination I experienced long ago, brought up to date with some recent events. With ACOG now declaring pro-life behavior unethical, the experience remains a valid look at the thinking of the abortion supporters.

I’m somewhat hesitant to bring up my experiences because of what Christian through the centuries have endured for the cause of Christ. My minor skirmishes seem trivial. Anyway, I received a note from a medical student wondering about referring for abortion and prenatal genetic testing and how one responds being pro-life.

Congress codified our rights of conscience, but the proabortion folks want that changed. So, standing for life will likely still involve some persecution. And I expect the persecution to intensify.

Here’s my story.

Pro-Life Discrimination

The year was 1977. I was just starting my last year of medical school at University of South Dakota. My class rank was high, #1 or #2. I had done well on the National Boards. Residency programs viewed me as a desirable candidate. My wife and I, always committed Christians, had three children. I feared my pro-life views could be a problem when applying for an OB/GYN residency position. Many publicly-supported OB/GYN residency programs ran large abortion services staffed by resident physicians. I knew I would face the issue, but hoped to get into a good residency, nonetheless.

I interviewed at St.Paul-Ramsey County Hospital in St. Paul, MN, and, as I came to expect, I met with the chairman of the department last. His name was Eric Hakenson, MD. During our talk, he got around to asking if I would do abortions. I told him I would not. He got nervous, started to pace and explained that the abortion service was very busy and having a resident not perform abortion upset the order of things and put more burden on other residents and staff. Then, with a firm voice, his hands on his desk leaning forward, he looked me straight in the eye and said, “If two candidates are otherwise equal, I will always choose the one who does abortions.” Translation: You won’t match for this program.

I interviewed at the University of Wisconsin in Madison and met with Ben Peckham, MD, chairman of the department last. It was a “hurry-up” meeting as I was not scheduled to interview with him. I think someone with whom I interviewed must have told him I was a good candidate. Just speculation, of course. Dr. Peckam invited me sit and then spent some time perusing my file. After about 5 minutes, he asked, “Will you do abortions?” (He got right to the point.) I said no. He then leaned back in his chair and went on to explain with great flourish how busy their abortion service was, how important it was to have everyone on board and what a problem it was to have a resident try to opt out. Then, he leaned forward and said, “I can tell you, Dr. Anderson, if you won’t do abortions, you are at the very bottom of our list.” His fat jowls shook back and forth as he emphasized the word, “bottom”. He impressed me for three reasons. One, he called me “doctor” and I wasn’t a doctor yet. Two, his declaration of my lowly position because of my pro-life views surprised me. Maybe stunned is a better word. Third, only two of us were in the room. He could deny ever having said that if I made a fuss. No one witnessed his statement but me.

I then understood that being pro-life meant more than a philosophy, a religious conviction or a world view. My pro-life views contained a real, tangible cost–job denial. But I didn’t care for the Wisconsin program anyway.

When I interviewed at Iowa, I spoke with the only pro-life staff member and one of the only pro-life residents. They both assured me the abortion service was optional and that I could opt out without penalty. At that time, a new chairman had just been appointed. William Keetel, MD, the outgoing chairman, had worsening health and was stepping down. James Scott, MD, and Roy Pitkin, MD, vied for the chairmanship. Both were outstanding candidates for this prestigious position to which Dr. Pitkin ascended. (He later went from Iowa to chair the OB/GYN department at UCLA and edit Obstetrics and Gynecology, probably the premier OB/GYN journal in the world. Dr. Scott went on to chair the department at Utah and I think edited the same journal later.) Of my two interviewers, neither had worked significantly under Dr. Pitkin and so based their statements about the optional abortion service from their experience with Dr. Keetel as chairman. I discovered later just how wrong they were.

In any event, the interview thrilled me. The Iowa OB/GYN residency program ranked near the top of OB/GYN programs in the country. My wife’s parents lived only 3 hours away from Iowa City. I applied and matched for Iowa.

I started in July, 1978. In September, I rotated through the outpatient clinic. During that rotation, those residents who did abortions would spend 2 ½ days a week in the abortion clinic. I told my chief resident I wouldn’t be going to which he replied, “Who you going to get to cover?”

“What?” I stuttered. “What do you mean? Get to cover.” He explained that the rotation was my responsibility and it had to be filled by me or someone who would fill in for me. “Well, who would that be?” I asked. “One of your resident-mates, of course,” he replied.

There were 6 of us first year residents. I would have to ask one of my residents-mates to give up the rotation they were on, either surgery, OB, NICU or whichever to help me. Fat chance of that, I thought. I had to fill the spot or get coverage—and there was no coverage.

Then, the chief resident explained I could just go over to do the history and physical exams (H&P’s) in the abortion clinic, and not actually do the abortions. That would fulfill my requirement. He didn’t see a problem with that even being pro-life since I wouldn’t actually be required to do the abortions. The OB/GYN staff would the actual abortions. Following that conversation, two or three staff doctors pulled me aside to “enlighten” me about abortion. I was naïve, I was told. I didn’t understand the problems these women faced they said. I was just obviously stupid I was told. If I went to work in the abortion clinic and saw the plight of these women, saw what a great and needed service abortion was, then, by the end of the rotation, I too would be pro-choice. (Looking back, I believe I was “tag-teamed” by the residents and staff at the direction of Dr. Pitkin, the new chairman.)

So, I caved. I went over and worked the clinic; doing the H&P’s and having the patients sign a consent form. Then I stood back while staff did the abortion. Following the abortion, I dug through the “POC’s” (products of conception) to see if all the parts were there—arms, legs, head, hands, feet, placenta. Part of helping without actually doing the abortions, you understand.

I did that for two months my first year and two months my second year. (A supposedly pro-life resident who started the next year also didn’t do abortions, but decided do them for a week, just to get good at the procedure. Oh dear.)

To understand my behavior, realize that I was 27 years old and had been a student my whole life. My teachers were my bosses and authority figures. I wrote down and memorized everything they said. So I felt incredible pressure to work the abortion clinic when they told me I was stupid and could not possibly understand about abortion since I hadn’t been there. I have no excuses though. I took the easy way. I should have stood my ground and raised a ruckus. I should have known you don’t have to crawl into the pigpen to know it smells bad. But I didn’t stand my ground, much to my shame.

When I started my third year, I slowly realized I had been duped. I remained pro-life and had not changed my mind at all. Abortion-minded women faced problem pregnancies, but none of these problems justified ending a baby’s life in my mind. I heard again and again: I’m not ready, my boyfriend wants me to, I’d have to leave school, my parents will never understand, I’m too young, I’m too old, and on and on. Abortion counselors always reached the same conclusion: the reason these women gave justified abortion.

Then, I started to think about all those conversations, about how I was naïve, stupid and uninformed. About how I would change my mind if only I could understand these women and these problem pregnancies by working in the clinic and seeing and speaking with those women desiring abortion. But I didn’t change my mind. My pro-life views solidified. The more I thought about it, the angrier I became. I asked to see Dr. Pitkin to share my concerns. I wanted him to understand the pressure I felt and how wrong that was. In my mind, I thought he would listen and issue some directive that such coercion stop. At that time, I hadn’t considered that he directed my experience intentionally.

As I explained to him my experience, he argued back, telling me the process had worked just as planned, that I needed that exposure and that he wouldn’t change a thing. What an eye-opening experience as the realization settled in. He was glad I had been coerced!

Shock and anger filled me. I had to do something. I couldn’t let this go unchallenged. I looked up right to life organizations (pre-internet) and was somehow placed in contact with Bob Dopf, a pro-life lawyer in Des Moines who did pro-bono work for pro-life organizations. I explained my story to him. He told me not to go to the newspapers or press (which I suggested), but to just calm down. He would write a letter to Dr. Pitkin asking for clarification. In the letter, he stated that if indeed pro-life residents were coerced into working the abortion clinic, any available remedy might be pursued.

Later that week, the letter hit like a bomb. I got this frantic call from Dr. Pitkin’s secretary telling me to drop everything and meet with Dr. Pitkin ASAP. When I came in, he was holding the letter from my attorney while pacing back and forth. (He had a plaque in his office that said, “Lead, follow or get out of the way.”) After about five minutes of pacing, he said, or rather yelled, “Does this mean you are suing the department?”

“No,” I replied, “not if you change your policy.” I don’t remember much after that except about 15 minutes of ranting and anger directed at me. I felt I was in a position of equality with him. He could harass me all he wanted in his office, but the letter made it clear I already felt harassed which meant he would certainly face repercussions if he fired me now. Even feeling that way, I left his office shaken. I wanted to explain myself to someone higher up than Dr. Pitkin. If I could get Dr. Pitkin’s boss to see my dilemma and support me, I could better survive. I went right to the president of the hospital’s office and asked to see him. He was just hanging up the phone—from Dr. Pitkin!

I knew word of this would be everywhere within a day, given that academic institutions thrive on gossip, so I decided to write a letter to the resident physicians explaining myself. I knew whatever they heard from administration would be negative.

So I did.

It didn’t help.

I lost all my friends. People avoided me. Conversations were strained. When I would approach a group, all talking would cease. People started wearing buttons in support of abortion and pro-choice politics, making sure I saw them everywhere.

More letters between Mr. Dopf and Dr. Pitkin followed with a promise from Dr. Pitkin that the department would respect the conscience of pro-life residents. Mr. Dopf and I discussed Dr. Pitkin’s response. Mr. Dopf wanted to be sure Dr. Pitkin’s response was adequate and that I felt satisfied. We both wanted to help future pro-life resident physicians. Dr. Pitkin’s letter satisfied me that future pro-life resident doctors would be free from harassment which resolved the issue. I heard later from other resident-mates that Dr. Pitkin stood his ground and that nothing had changed and I was defeated. Oh dear.

One good thing came as a result of my actions. As a result of our conversations, Mr. Dopf’s political connections came to realize Medicaid (Title XIX) paid for abortions in Iowa at that time. In January, two months later, Iowa passed a bill into law stopping Medicaid funding of abortions.

In time, the issue cooled and, by my last year of residency, I was again one of the group—sort of.

About four years into private practice in Burlington, IA, a pro-life patient of mine asked about my views on abortion, so I shared some of my story. That led to many speaking engagements and eventually a position on the board of directors of Birthright, a mostly Catholic crisis pregnancy organization. Eventually, I was asked to sit on their international board.

In private practice, I’ve worked almost exclusively with pro-choice doctors but I’ve always told them up front that I was pro-life and would leave the practice if any of them did abortions. So, life issues were not much problem. Unfortunately, the office staff would preferentially route abortion-minded patients to my pro-choice partners, so I saw few women considering abortion.

In 2004, my wife and I moved to Minnesota to be closer to children and grandchildren. (Four children, twelve grandchildren with #13 on the way!) I found work with a large health care organization. No abortions are done in the hospital at which I work.

After WORLD published my piece on the Hippocratic Registry of Physicians (Life and Death, June 20, 2009), my employer blocked my blog site,, from their network. WORLD listed my blog site address at the end of the piece. I showed the article to some doctors and nurse friends around the hospital. Apparently, word got out that I had a blog and someone complained that my site contained inappropriate content since I advocated for the traditional family. My employer (specifically, the vice-president of nursing) viewed such advocacy as anti-gay and anti-unmarried-having-children-and-shacking-up. (“Very sad” read her e-mail describing my blog.)

So, in addition to facing possible government censure or loss of livelihood should Mr. Obama get his way, I can’t even view my own blog at work! I rank right up there with the pornography sites.

So at what price do I stand for life? Not much price, really. We 21st century Christians are a coddled bunch, I think. Consider Christians in the first and second centuries who were thrown to the lions for sport just for counting themselves as followers of Christ. Consider the reformers, Martin Luther in particular, hiding out at Augsburg for over a year to avoid capture. Consider William Tyndale, captured and killed for translating the Bible into English from Greek and Hebrew. Consider John Bunyon, imprisoned for not bowing to the Church of England. Consider David Brainard, missionary to the Indians in colonial America, developing tuberculosis and dying at the house of Jonathon Edwards. Consider Adoniram Judson, missionary to Burma, losing 3 wives to tropical diseases, then becoming ill himself and dying on board ship with no family or friends while trying to make it back to America.

So I can write my own story of discrimination and despair, but I feel silly doing it when I place it in the perspective of the centuries. But, having said that, one can possibly see economic sanctions and loss of livelihood on the horizon, and who can tell what next? Perhaps our sovereign God will deign for us persecution—real persecution—as our Christian forefathers faced. In all, my faith and hope rests in Him, “For from him and through him and to him are all things. To him be glory forever. Amen.” Rom 11:36 (ESV)

11 Responses to “Prolife Discrimmination”

  1. lindsay said

    Well said… Even though my fiance and I were not married when we had our son Brock we wouldnt have it any other way. The love we share for one another is the same as if we were married. Like I said before thank you for your blogs they are very uplifting! Lindsay. By the way I just noticed you have the same name as my obgyn. doubt your the same person but i thought it was pretty cool

  2. MDViews said

    Thank you for responding. I, too, was surprised about the reaction of my company blocking my blog. My defend the family and its salutary effect on children in every aspect. There are those who say a woman needs a man like a fish needs a bicycle. I humbly disagree and am glad when the science backs me up.

    Matt A.

  3. lindsay said

    I also would like to thank you for standing your ground on being prolife. I came across your website while looking to write a pro life paper for school. now my whole family enjoys reading your blogs. I have an eleven month old son and am not married to his father until next June. I saw what you wrote about what some of your coworkers wrote about your blog. I as an unmarried mom am in no way offended by your blogs but find them very uplifting!

  4. Thank you for your insightful blog post. You may be interested in my new book, “A Different Dream for My Child: Meditations for Parents of Critically and Chronically Ill Children” which will be released by Discovery House Publishers in September of this year. One family featured in the book learned their child would be born dead when the mother was 4 months along. She carried the child to term, and the wisdom of these parents is precious. I’m also building a website which will be a forum and clearing house for parents.

  5. Patricia said

    My daughter(s) is(are) very prolife as am I. She debates at school and online as well. She attends a Catholic hs here in Canada (I forgot to mention that we are Canucks but I think the same situation applies pretty much here as there re; med schools) and yes, she has some vehemently proabort Catholic classmates. She was able to get a girl to admit in front of all their friends that she believed in killing a human baby in an impromptu debate in the school cafe one day. She didn’t do it to embarass the girl but to show her where her logic was taking her and what it really meant. She ridiculed my daughter for her belief in NFP but had no understanding of how a woman’s body worked (no doubt she knew all about condoms). Many young people simply repeat the rhetoric of “choice” without really thinking deeper about the logic (or lack thereof).
    We KNOW there are a lot of proabort Catholics – look at who almost singlehandedly elected Obama!
    Please pray for all these young people who will be called upon to be the salt of the earth and shine the light of truth – at great cost because our generation was too lazy, too weak-willed and to Godless. 😦
    Keep up your blog
    It’s good!

  6. MDViews said

    Thank you for your reply. I’ve used my story in pro-life speaking in the past, having been on the board of Birthright Int’l for a time. Please encourage your daughter to stand for life in whatever profession she chooses, especially motherhood, if our God grants her children one day! OB/GYN is now a female dominated specialty, and at the top in the universities and medical schools are the radical, feminist, career-at-all-cost, NARAL and Planned Parenthood types. Yes, we need salt and light in our profession. We need prolife people.

    Unfortunately, there are more Catholics who advocate for abortion than you may think, just as there are conservative evangelical protestants who are abortion advocates. And, of course, you are right. Our turn for outright persecution will come. Blessings to you and yours.

    Matt A.

  7. Patricia said

    Thank you for your story. May I send your piece to a well known prolife blogger? She just might post on it.
    I have a 17 year old daughter who is seriously considering medicine as a career. I wonder. I encourage her and she works very hard at her studies because we both believe that as prolife Catholics (are there any other?) we need to be IN the world. We can’t give up on these professions which are becoming more and more anti-life.
    I think you are quite correct when you say that as Christians in the Western world we have been coddled. Everywhere else Christians are being martyred. But our turn will come. It will start out as a “white martyrdom” and quickly move onto other ways.
    I work as a librarian and I can say that profession isn’t prolife either.
    I wish you many blessings.

  8. MDViews said


    Thank you for sharing your story. My wife and I are godparents to MJ, the first son of my brother and his wife. MJ also has Down syndrome. He has been a challenge but a blessing to the entire family. He has also taught us compassion and love for people with disabilities.

    Please know you are not alone. God has an army of like-minded Christians out there. God spirit may yet blow through our country, changing hearts to value life.

    Matt A.

  9. Theresa said

    Where to begin after reading about your experiences? First, let me say thank you for the courage you have shown over the years to stand up for your beliefs. I believe God will honor you, if not in this life then certainly in heaven. Second, this is an issue near and dear to my heart. I have had three miscarriages and no one will ever be able to tell me that I did not lose a child during those times. The third miscarriage (through ultrasound) allowed me to see my baby fully-formed, though lifeless. I have a son with Down syndrome and it appalls me to think how many of these children are gotten rid of through abortion just because of this condition. The pre-natal testing that has been developed recently for DS is disturbing, to say the least. One of our local hospitals (which even has the word “Baptist” in its title) had a radio ad campaign promoting this kind of testing as a “highlight” of its services. What is the purpose of this testing if not to encourage abortion? My husband and I knew there was a problem with our son when I was pregnant (again, through ultrasound) but we refused all testing. We put his life in God’s hands and prayed like crazy! God didn’t take away the Down syndrome but he gave us a son who has taught me more about His heart and unconditional love than I ever would have learned with a “normal” child. My two daughters also have learned about compassion and kindness because of their brother.

    As I read through your comments, I was struck by the thought that it sounded like you were doing a residency in China and not the United States of America. How sad for our country. I am going to keep you in my prayers and thank you again for being a voice out there. I so often feel alone in my beliefs and try not to get discouraged. You have given me a ray of hope today.

    As for the place where you work, shame on them for banning your blog!

  10. MDViews said

    Thank you for your comments. I sorry for your loss of Luke. May God provide comfort. Matt A.

  11. bmjmcmdm said

    I just stumbled upon your article in ‘world’. we have just recently lost our son, luke, because of severe IUGR. our care was good, everyone was kind.
    I am so proud to know that you are standing your ground for prolife. that is impressive. I wish you well as I’m sure that path is going to get harder and harder… for all of us.
    God bless you and your work~

    jenifer matthews~ my story since the loss of luke, you’d have to start at the begining, but it would solidify the grief of losing a child… I can’t imagine adding the grief of knowing I played any part in when luke’s time here was done.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s